[Salon] Trump’s Middle East ideologues face a reality check’



Trump’s Middle East ideologues face a reality check’

Summary: the president-elect is busy filling Middle East posts with ideological zealots backing Israel but the likelihood is that he will strive mightily to rein in any efforts to involve America in a war with Iran.

We thank Andreas Krieg for today’s newsletter. Andreas is an assistant professor at the Defence Studies Department of King's College London and a strategic risk consultant working for governmental and commercial clients in the Middle East. His latest book Subversion: the strategic weaponisation of narratives was published last year by Georgetown University Press. He is a regular guest on the Arab Digest podcast. You can find his most recent podcast Netanyahu and the war of weaponised narratives here.

A quick glance at Trump’s appointees relevant to Middle Eastern policy suggests that Benjamin Netanyahu’s far right government now has ideological comrades in the White House. They include Marco Rubio tipped for Secretary of State, Fox News host Pete Hegseth selected for Secretary of Defence, US ambassador-elect to Israel Mike Huckabee and Steve Witkoff picked as Trump's Middle East envoy – every single one of them has in the past wedded himself not just to Israel but to the extremist narratives of religious Zionism represented in Israel’s current government. However, while in particular Rubio and Huckabee have been pushing these narratives on the campaign trail for political reasons, all of them will now face a reality check when it comes to formulating and delivering a coherent Middle East policy.

For one, the unequivocal support for Israel’s unhinged policy of military annihilation of the idea of resistance will cause friction with Trump’s overarching objective to end all wars in the region. Netanyahu has proven time and again in the past 13 months that he favours protracted military operations without clear strategic objectives over taking diplomatic off ramps to end hostilities. Especially in the war in Gaza where military objectives have already been exhausted, billions of US taxpayer dollars have been wasted to keep Netanyahu in power while hostages are not being returned and tens of thousands of Gazan civilians have been killed.


The IDF, which failed to destroy Hamas, will not be able to destroy Hezbollah, which is hundreds of times more powerful [photo credit: Al Qassam Brigades]

In Lebanon, Israel will not be able to achieve more than degrading Hezbollah while it continues to be able to fire rockets into Israel. Yet the campaign against Hezbollah appears to have spiralled out of control as Israel has redirected its war aims against all of Iran’s ‘Axis of Resistance.' And while the Trump administration will return to a ‘maximum pressure’ campaign the new White House will desperately try not to be pulled into war with Iran but to delegate the burden of conflict to regional partners.

The second and equally important point of friction is the reliance of Trump’s regional policy on the Gulf states. While the pro-Israel lobby will try to sell narratives to the Trump ideologues, the various Gulf lobbies have deep pockets that have entangled business networks around Trump already. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar have all built extensive relationships with the Trump ecosystem – all underwritten by lucrative investments. Moreover, the president-elect knows he will not need the pro-Israel lobby to get re-elected as this will be his last term. The Gulf lobbies, however, can provide lucrative avenues to retirement not just for Trump and his family but for many of those appointed by him into positions of power.

And the interests of the Gulf states will not be easily reconcilable with the interests of Netanyahu’s Israel. On Gaza, there is strong opposition to what the Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman referred to as ‘collective genocide’ committed by Israel in Gaza. The annexation of Gazan and West Bank territory will not be acceptable to America’s Gulf partners and likely will be a red line that Trump and his ideologues won’t want to cross. However, in the absence of a clear US strategy emerging from Israel’s multi-front war, it remains to be seen whether the Gulf can offer anything tangible that prevents Israel creating irreversible faits accomplis on the ground.

That in turn risks upending the little progress that has been achieved by the US in pushing Gulf states into normalising with Israel. The red lines by Saudi Arabia have been made clear. The Saudis will not readily join the Abraham Accords and normalising with the Jewish state will come with clear demands for Palestinian statehood. Trump’s Middle East team of ideologues will soon find that emboldening the far right in Israel will make it ever more unpalatable for the kingdom to recognise Israel.

On Iran, the Gulf states find themselves in a different position from 2017 when Trump first entered the White House. The absence of credible US leadership in the meantime meant these states have effectively diversified their global networks and partnerships. They are today far less reliant on Washington than they were even a few years ago. What is more, the Gulf states are also now far more conscious of their leverage vis-à-vis the United States as engagement and reconciliation have been the name of the game in the Gulf in recent years. There is consensus that bringing Iran into the fold is far better for business than cornering the Islamic Republic thus amplifying its subversive surrogate operations. The efforts at reconciliation especially between Riyadh and Tehran over the past 18 months appear to be irreversible. Thus, in terms of delivering ‘maximum pressure’ the Trump administration will not be able to rely much on the support of Gulf capitals this time around. And Israel’s warmongering narratives of regime change can only be put into effect if the US was willing to pour significant blood and treasure into the conflict – something that would fundamentally contradict one of Trump’s few principles of no more American wars in the Middle East.

So while the Trump team has been deeply ideological in how they talk about Israel for domestic consumption, designing and delivering policy in the Middle East requires far more balance than delivering Zionist talking points in a Fox News commentary. The reality check will come fast – especially if Trump is really interested in a grand bargain to secure his legacy both financially and politically. The deal of the century can be done but only if Trump uses the leverage America still has to keep Netanyahu and company in check. Should the incoming president and his team be played the way Bibi played Biden US leadership in the region will continue to decline.

Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Arab Digest website


follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2024 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.